Template:New Study lacking replication

From ReplicationWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Text replace - "http://dx.doi" to "https://doi")
 
Line 56: Line 56:
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
DOI: [[DOI::{{#if:{{{formdoi|}}}|[http://dx.doi.org/{{{formdoi}}} {{{formdoi}}}]|-}}]]
+
DOI: [[DOI::{{#if:{{{formdoi|}}}|[https://doi.org/{{{formdoi}}} {{{formdoi}}}]|-}}]]
 
IDEAS: [[IDEAS/RePEc::{{#if:{{{formideas|}}}|[http://ideas.repec.org/{{{formideas}}} {{{formideas}}}]|-}}]]
 
IDEAS: [[IDEAS/RePEc::{{#if:{{{formideas|}}}|[http://ideas.repec.org/{{{formideas}}} {{{formideas}}}]|-}}]]
 
EconPapers: [[EconPapers/RePEc::{{#if:{{{formeconpapers|}}}|[http://EconPapers.repec.org/{{{formeconpapers}}} {{{formeconpapers}}}]|-}}]]
 
EconPapers: [[EconPapers/RePEc::{{#if:{{{formeconpapers|}}}|[http://EconPapers.repec.org/{{{formeconpapers}}} {{{formeconpapers}}}]|-}}]]

Latest revision as of 15:39, 21 October 2019

How revelant do you consider a replication of this study? You may discuss on the discussion page.


Nobody voted on this yet

 You need to enable JavaScript to vote


Here you find a ranking of the studies that are regarded most relevant to be replicated.

Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
{{{articleauthors}}} {{{articletitle}}} - - - - - -

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
- - - - - - - -

Replication of this study

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement

References

DOI: - IDEAS: - EconPapers: -

[[Category:{{{articlejournal}}} {{{articleyear}}} ]]


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox