Main Page

From ReplicationWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(link fix)
(reducing "News" to new stuff, archived under current events)
Line 116: Line 116:
  
 
[http://ineteconomics.org/community/events/replication-and-transparency-in-economic-research Workshop on Replication and Transparency in Economic Research] at Mozilla San Francisco, January 6-7, 2016, with the [http://ineteconomics.org/community/young-scholars Young Scholars Initiative] of the [http://ineteconomics.org/ Institute for New Economic Thinking], [https://www.haverford.edu/users/rball Richard Ball] of the project [https://www.haverford.edu/tier Teaching Integrity in Empirical Reseach], [https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/ Johannes Pfeifer], Edward Miguel of the [http://bitss.org/ Berkeley Institute for Transparency in the Social Sciences], [http://replication.uni-goettingen.de/wiki/index.php/User:J.Hoeffler Jan H. Höffler] of the ReplicationWiki, and [https://ideas.repec.org/f/phe474.html Thomas Herndon] of the [[Does High Public Debt Consistently Stifle Economic Growth? A Critique of Reinhart and Rogoff (CambJE 2014)|Public Debt and Growth replication debate]]
 
[http://ineteconomics.org/community/events/replication-and-transparency-in-economic-research Workshop on Replication and Transparency in Economic Research] at Mozilla San Francisco, January 6-7, 2016, with the [http://ineteconomics.org/community/young-scholars Young Scholars Initiative] of the [http://ineteconomics.org/ Institute for New Economic Thinking], [https://www.haverford.edu/users/rball Richard Ball] of the project [https://www.haverford.edu/tier Teaching Integrity in Empirical Reseach], [https://sites.google.com/site/pfeiferecon/ Johannes Pfeifer], Edward Miguel of the [http://bitss.org/ Berkeley Institute for Transparency in the Social Sciences], [http://replication.uni-goettingen.de/wiki/index.php/User:J.Hoeffler Jan H. Höffler] of the ReplicationWiki, and [https://ideas.repec.org/f/phe474.html Thomas Herndon] of the [[Does High Public Debt Consistently Stifle Economic Growth? A Critique of Reinhart and Rogoff (CambJE 2014)|Public Debt and Growth replication debate]]
 
New working paper [http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/feds/2015/files/2015083pap.pdf Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals Say ”Usually Not”] by Andrew C. Chang and Philipp Li
 
 
[[:Category:Critical Finance Review|Critical Finance Review]] announces [http://cfr.ivo-welch.info/RFP.html Special Replication Issues], September 2015
 
 
New working paper ''[https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedlwp/2015-016.html On the Need for a Replication Journal]'' by Christian Zimmermann
 
 
A [https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2016/preliminary.php?search_string=replication&search_type=session&association=&jel_class=&search=Search#search_box session on Replication in Economics] will be held during the [https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2016/ American Economic Association Annual Meeting, January 3-5, 2016, in San Francisco]
 
 
The [http://ajps.org/ American Journal of Political Science] publishes [http://ajpsblogging.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/ajps-guide-for-replic-materials-1-0.pdf Guidelines for Preparing Replication Files] and announces that "submitted replication materials will be verified" by the [http://www.odum.unc.edu/odum/home2.jsp University of North Carolina’s Odum Institute for Research in Social Science] "to guarantee that they do, in fact, properly reproduce the analysis results". March 26, 2015.
 
 
The [[3ie Replication Programme]] accepts expressions of interest for its call on replications on HIV prevention until May 31, 2015.
 
 
[http://www.cgdev.org/publication/meaning-failed-replications-review-and-proposal-working-paper-399 Working paper: "The Meaning of Failed Replications: A Review and Proposal"] by [[Michael A. Clemens|Michael Clemens]], April 9, 2015 - response: "[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2598464 Replication Talk Costs Lives: Why are economists so concerned about the reputational effects of replications?]" by [[Richard Palmer-Jones]], April 24, 2015
 
 
[https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=ESWC2015&paper_id=2280 Working paper: "Pre Analysis Plans Help (only) when Replications are Infeasible"] by Lucas C. Coffman and Muriel Niederle, February 14, 2015
 
 
[https://opennessinitiative.org/ Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative] calls for reviewers to, "beginning January 1, 2017, [...] make open practices a pre-condition for more comprehensive review."
 
 
Since during the [http://www.bitss.org/events/annual-meeting-2014/ 2014 Research Transparency Forum] of the [http://bitss.org Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences] we received the valuable feedback that our [[ReplicationWiki:Help/Traffic_lights|traffic lights]] could be misinterpreted as a judgment on quality of the studies we now changed the red one to a warning triangle. Feel free to [[ReplicationWiki_talk:Help/Traffic_lights|discuss]]!
 
 
[https://biblio.repec.org/entry/ada.html RePEc bibliography on replication] started
 
 
Article "[http://pfr.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/09/22/1091142114549229.full.pdf+html The Need for Replications]" in [[:Category:PFR|Public Finance Review]] by [[James Alm]] and [[W. Robert Reed]] in [http://pfr.sagepub.com/content/43/2.toc special issue with replications]
 
<br />
 
 
[http://blog.repec.org/2014/07/16/economics-replication-wiki-now-on-ideas/ ideas/RePEc now links back to studies of ReplicationWiki]
 
<br />
 
 
[http://www.3ieimpact.org/media/filer/2014/04/11/rps-1-replication-top-final.pdf Quality evidence for policymaking: I’ll believe it when I see the replication - 3ie Replication Paper] ([[3ie Replication Programme Candidate Studies List]] for impact evaluations now integrated in the ReplicationWiki)
 
<br />
 
 
[http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble Article about unreliable research - The Economist]<br />
 
 
[http://curriculumconference2013.weaconferences.net/papers/teaching-replication-in-quantitative-empirical-economics/ Paper about Teaching Replication in Quantitative Empirical Economics] - [http://www.eea-esem.com/eea-esem/2014/prog/viewpaper.asp?pid=3108 updated for Econometric Society European Meeting - 28th August 2014]<br />
 
 
[http://ineteconomics.org/ideas-papers/blog/economics-needs-replication INET blog: Economics needs replication]<br />
 
 
[http://www.uni-goettingen.de/en/449472.html Working paper online: Replication in the narrow sense of Banzhaf/Walsh (2008)]<br />
 
 
[http://www.uni-goettingen.de/en/449471.html Working paper online: Narrow Replication of Ashcraft (2005): Are Banks Really Special?]<br />
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 19:45, 26 April 2016

12,051 articles
Slide1.png
Slide2.png
Slide3.png
Slide4.png
Slide5.png
Slide6.png
Slide7.png
Slide8.png
Slide9.png
Slide10.png
Slide11.png

About the project

For scientific progress, it is pivotal to review research findings by independently replicating results, thus making the findings more reliable. However, in econometric research, it is not yet common practice to publish replication findings. This wiki serves as a database of empirical studies, the availability of replication material for them and of replication studies. It can help teaching replication to students. Seminars at several faculties internationally were already taught for which the information of this database was used.
So far the focus has been on some leading journals in economics. Replication results can be published as replication working papers of the University of Göttingen's Center for Statistics.
Teaching and providing access to information will raise awareness for the need for replications, provide a basis for research about the reasons why replications so often fail and how this can be changed, and educate future generations of economists about how to make research replicable. The starting phase of this project was funded by the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET).

Join the project

You can join the project by entering a new replication or empirical studies that could be replicated. For the latter you can vote which ones you find most relevant to be replicated. Furthermore, you can improve the articles in the wiki and make comments. Under current events you can announce news and upcoming events. The community portal lists open tasks and suggestions for the wiki.

Latest replication

News

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox