Why the Oberholzer-Gee/Strumpf Article on File Sharing Is Not Credible (EJW 2016)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search



Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Stan J. Liebowitz Why the Oberholzer-Gee/Strumpf Article on File Sharing Is Not Credible EJW 2016 3 373–96 Z1, O3, L8 Popular music, Album sales, Intellectual property, Illegal downloading, Instrumental variables

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
- - - - - - - -

This article is a replication of

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement
Felix Oberholzer-Gee, Koleman Strumpf The effect of file sharing on record sales JPE 2007 1 1–42 - - - - - 1 - yes -

References

DOI: - IDEAS: a/ejw/journl/v13y2016i3p373-396.html EconPapers: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:3:p:373-396


Reply: Felix Oberholzer-Gee, Koleman Strumpf 2016, "The effect of file sharing on record sales, revisited", Information Economics and Policy, December, Vol.37:61–66, doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.11.001 IDEAS: a/eee/iepoli/v37y2016icp61-66.html EconPapers: RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:37:y:2016:i:c:p:61-66

Reply to reply: Stan J. Liebowitz, "Responding to Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf’s Attempted Defense of Their Piracy Paper", Econ Journal Watch 2017, a/ejw/journl/v14y2017i2p174-195.html EconPapers: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:14:y:2017:i:2:p:174-195

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox