Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate (Stanford Law Review 2010)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This page needs attention because from the abstract of the replication it seems the original paper already replicated the replicating authors' and others' previous work, and from the abstract of the reply one can see that this replication referred to a number of previous studies.



Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
John J. Donohue, Justin Wolfers Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate Stanford Law Review 2010 3 791 K14, K42 Capital punishment, Crime, Death penalty, Deterrence, Execution, Homicide, Murder

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
- - - - - - - -

Replication of this study

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement
Hashem Dezhbakhsh, Paul H. Rubin From the ‘econometrics of capital punishment’ to the ‘capital punishment’ of econometrics: on the use and abuse of sensitivity analysis AE 2011 25 3655-70 - - - - - 1 - yes -

References

DOI: - IDEAS: p/cpr/ceprdp/5493.html EconPapers: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5493


Reply: Deterring Murder: A Reply, Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 3 (Dec., 2005), pp. 847-857.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox