The Opt-In Revolution? Contraception and the Gender Gap in Wages (AEJ:AE 2012)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
How revelant do you consider a replication of this study? You may discuss on the discussion page.


Nobody voted on this yet

 You need to enable JavaScript to vote


Here you find a ranking of the studies that are regarded most relevant to be replicated.

Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Martha J. Bailey, Brad Hershbein, Amalia R. Miller The Opt-In Revolution? Contraception and the Gender Gap in Wages AEJ:AE 2012 3 225 - 254 J13, J16, J31, J71, J24 -

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
1 - accessible on journal website 0 - not available online 1 - accessible on journal website - Micro National Longitudinal Survey of Young Women, available from, US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), - for non-public Geocode data qualified researchers can request access, US National Fertility Survey, 1970, available from, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), (for institutional members of ICPSR) - for non-public Geocode data qualified researchers can request access, US Current Population Survey (CPS), available from, US Census Integrated Public Use Microsample (US IPUMS) USA Stata, 11.2

Replication of this study

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement

References

DOI: 10.1257/app.4.3.225 IDEAS: a/aea/aejapp/v4y2012i3p225-54.html EconPapers: RePEc:aea:aejapp:v:4:y:2012:i:3:p:225-54


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox