Research Design Meets Market Design: Using Centralized Assignment for Impact Evaluation (ECTA 2017)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
How revelant do you consider a replication of this study? You may discuss on the discussion page.


Nobody voted on this yet

 You need to enable JavaScript to vote


Here you find a ranking of the studies that are regarded most relevant to be replicated.

Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Atila Abdulkadiroglu, Joshua D. Angrist, Yusuke Narita, Parag A. Pathak Research Design Meets Market Design: Using Centralized Assignment for Impact Evaluation ECTA 2017 5 1373-432 C26, D47, I20 Matching market design, Natural experiment, Program evaluation, Random assignment, Quasi-experimental research design, School effectiveness, Charter schools

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
1 - accessible on journal website 1 - accessible on journal website 0 - not available online Instrumental variable (IV), Two-stage least squares (2SLS), Bootstrap, Clustering - - Denver, USA Stata

Replication of this study

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement

References

DOI: 10.3982/ECTA13925 IDEAS: a/wly/emetrp/v85y2017ip1373-1432.html EconPapers: article/wlyemetrp/v_3a85_3ay_3a2017_3ai_3a_3ap_3a1373-1432.htm


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox