Particulate Pollution and the Productivity of Pear Packers (AEJ:EP 2016)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
How revelant do you consider a replication of this study? You may discuss on the discussion page.


Nobody voted on this yet

 You need to enable JavaScript to vote


Here you find a ranking of the studies that are regarded most relevant to be replicated.

Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Tom Chang, Joshua Graff Zivin, Tal Gross, Matthew Neidell Particulate Pollution and the Productivity of Pear Packers AEJ:EP 2016 3 141–69 D24, J24, L66, Q13, Q51, Q53 -

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
1 - accessible on journal website 0 - not available online 1 - accessible on journal website Clustering - firm that shared data with authors no longer in business, no contact information for obtaining the data, pollution and weather data were obtained from California air resources board but location confidential California, USA Stata

Replication of this study

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement

References

DOI: 10.1257/pol.20150085 IDEAS: a/aea/aejpol/v8y2016i3p141-69.html EconPapers: RePEc:aea:aejpol:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:141-69


Corrigendum: Corrigendum: Particulate Pollution and the Productivity of Pear Packers (AEJ:EP 2019)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox