Meta-analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT-PET-PEESE procedure work? A replication study of Alinaghi & Reed (Research Synthesis Methods, 2018) (Int J Re-Views in Emp Econ 2019)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This pages indicates replication material is available elsewhere than in a journal archive, but there is no link to where this material can be found.


Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Sanghyun Hong Meta-analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT-PET-PEESE procedure work? A replication study of Alinaghi & Reed (Research Synthesis Methods, 2018) Int J Re-Views in Emp Econ 2019 - 1-22 B41, C15, C18 -

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
1 - accessible on journal website 2 - available online elsewhere than on journal website 1 - accessible on journal website Monte Carlo - - - R

This article is a replication of

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement
Nazila Alinaghi, W. Robert Reed Meta-analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT-PET-PEESE procedure work? Research Synthesis Methods 2018 2 285–311 B41, C15, C18 Meta-analysis, Publication bias, Funnel asymmetry test (FAT), Precision Effect Estimate with Standard Error (PEESE), Monte Carlo, Simulations 1 - narrow sense (same data, same code) 4 - partially successful 3 - final dataset can be exactly replicated from raw data - -

References

DOI: 10.15456/iree.2018280.233725 IDEAS: - EconPapers: -


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox