Meta-analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT-PET-PEESE procedure work? (Research Synthesis Methods 2018)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This pages indicates replication material is available elsewhere than in a journal archive, but there is no link to where this material can be found.


Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Nazila Alinaghi, W. Robert Reed Meta-analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT-PET-PEESE procedure work? Research Synthesis Methods 2018 2 285-311 B41, C15, C18 Meta-analysis, Publication bias, Funnel asymmetry test (FAT), Precision Effect Estimate with Standard Error (PEESE), Monte Carlo, Simulations

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
2 - available online elsewhere than on journal website 2 - available online elsewhere than on journal website - Monte Carlo - - - Stata

Replication of this study

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement
Sanghyun Hong Meta-analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT-PET-PEESE procedure work? A replication study of Alinaghi & Reed (Research Synthesis Methods, 2018) Int J Re-Views in Emp Econ 2019 - 1-22 B41, C15, C18 - 1 - narrow sense (same data, same code) 4 - partially successful 3 - final dataset can be exactly replicated from raw data - -

References

DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1298 IDEAS: p/vuw/vuwcpf/6709.html EconPapers: RePEc:vuw:vuwcpf:6709


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox