Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals Say ”Usually Not” (FEDS 2015)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This page needs attention because 66 other papers were also replicated, for the successful ones the working paper also states which ones. "Successful" here only means replication of main results did not deviate qualitatively. Replicated studies and RePEc links need to be updated once the working paper is published.



Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Andrew C. Chang, Phillip Li Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals Say ”Usually Not” FEDS 2015 - - B41, C80, C82, C87, C88, E01 Data and code archives, Gross domestic product, GDP, Journals, Macroeconomics, National income and product accounts, Publication, Research, Replication

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
0 - not available online 0 - not available online 0 - not available online - - GDP USA -

This article is a replication of

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement
Alan J. Auerbach, Yuriy Gorodnichenko Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy AEJ:EP 2012 2 1-27 C32, E62, H20, H62, H63 - 1 - narrow sense (same data, same code) 1 - successful - 0 - no -

References

DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2015.083 IDEAS: p/fip/fedgfe/2015-83.html EconPapers: RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2015-83


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox