Does the Supreme Court Really Not Apply Chevron When It Should? (International Review of Law and Economics 2019)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This page needs attention because replication was replicated by A replication study worth replicating: A comment on Salmanowitz and Spamann (International Review of Law and Economics 2019), Volume 58, June 2019, Pages 1-2, William H.J.Hubbard, DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2018.12.002.



Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Natalie Salmanowitz, Holger Spamann Does the Supreme Court Really Not Apply Chevron When It Should? International Review of Law and Economics 2019 57 81-89 K20, K23, K40 Chevron, Deference, Standard of review, Statutory interpretation, Administrative law, Supreme court

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
- - - - - - - -

This article is a replication of

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement
William N. Eskridge, Jr., Lauren E. Baer The Continuum of Deference: Supreme Court Treatment of Agency Statutory Interpretations from Chevron to Hamdan Georgetown Law Journal 2008 4 1083- - - - - - - -

References

DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2018.12.003 IDEAS: a/eee/irlaec/v57y2019icp81-89.html EconPapers: RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:57:y:2019:i:c:p:81-89


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox