Comments on ‘Jointness of growth determinants’ (JAE 2009)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
How revelant do you consider a replication of this study? You may discuss on the discussion page.

Nobody voted on this yet

 You need to enable JavaScript to vote

Here you find a ranking of the studies that are regarded most relevant to be replicated.



Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Eduardo Ley, Mark F. J. Steel Comments on ‘Jointness of growth determinants’ JAE 2009 2 248–251 - -

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
- - - - - no empirical results - no data and code - -

Replication of this study

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement


DOI: 10.1002/jae.1049 IDEAS: a/jae/japmet/v24y2009i2p248-251.html EconPapers: RePEc:jae:japmet:v:24:y:2009:i:2:p:248-251

Reply: "Jointness of growth determinants: Reply to comments by Rodney Strachan, Eduardo Ley and Mark F.J. Steel," Gernot Doppelhofer & Melvyn Weeks, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2009, 24(2), 252-6. EconPapers: [RePEc:jae:japmet:v:24:y:2009:i:2:p:252-256 RePEc:jae:japmet:v:24:y:2009:i:2:p:252-256] IDEAS/RePEc: a/jae/japmet/v24y2009i2p252-256.html DOI: 10.1002/jae.1047

Personal tools