Biased Sanctions? Methodological Change in Economic Sanction Reconsidered and its Implications (International Interactions forthcoming)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
When last checked on September 8, 2017, this study was forthcoming in the journal International Interactions.


Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, Muhammad S.H. Siddiquee Biased Sanctions? Methodological Change in Economic Sanction Reconsidered and its Implications International Interactions forthcoming - - F51 Economic sanctions, Replication, Coding, Data, Sanctions, HSE, Bias

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
1 - accessible on journal website 1 - accessible on journal website 1 - accessible on journal website Multivariate probit Cross section original data of the studies by Hufbauer et al USA Stata, 13

This article is a replication of

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement
Gary Clyde Hufbauer, Jeffrey J. Schott, Kimberly Ann Elliott, Barbara Oegg Economic Sanctions Reconsidered Peterson Institute for International Economics (book) 1990, 2007 (two editions) 2nd and 3rd edition - F51 Economic sanctions 3 - reproduction (new methods) 2 - failed (different results) 2 - raw data can be used to replicate a dataset that is not substantially different from the final dataset used for the publication 1 - yes -

References

DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2016.1242584 IDEAS: - EconPapers: -


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox