Backward Induction in the Wild? Evidence from Sequential Voting in the US Senate (AER 2018)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
How revelant do you consider a replication of this study? You may discuss on the discussion page.


Nobody voted on this yet

 You need to enable JavaScript to vote


Here you find a ranking of the studies that are regarded most relevant to be replicated.

Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Jörg L. Spenkuch, B. Pablo Montagnes, Daniel B. Magleby Backward Induction in the Wild? Evidence from Sequential Voting in the US Senate AER 2018 7 1971-2013 D72, D82, D83 Backward induction, Voting, U.S. Senate

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
1 - accessible on journal website 1 - accessible on journal website 1 - accessible on journal website - - Votes during 112th Congress USA Stata, MATLAB, C++

Replication of this study

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement

References

DOI: 10.1257/aer.20150993 IDEAS: a/aea/aecrev/v108y2018i7p1971-2013.html EconPapers: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:108:y:2018:i:7:p:1971-2013


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox