An Empirical Comparison Between the Synthetic Control Method and HSIAO et al.'s Panel Data Approach to Program Evaluation (JAE 2017)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
When last checked on August 22, 2017, this study had not yet been included in the RePEc databases.



Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
Javier Gardeazabal, Ainhoa Vega-Bayo An Empirical Comparison Between the Synthetic Control Method and HSIAO et al.'s Panel Data Approach to Program Evaluation JAE 2017 5 983–1002 - -

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
- - 1 - accessible on journal website Synthetic control method (SCM) Panel log of real GDP per capita, Laspeyres index, from, Penn World Tables (PWT), 7.0, 1957-2009, Sierra Leone wars, annual log real GDP per capita from 1970-2009, and Arab-Israeli wars, annual log real GDP per capita 1957-1975, quarterly real growth rate of 24 countries in donor pool and Hong Kong 1993:Q1-2008:Q1, politcal and economic integration 157 countries, Sierra Leone, 41 countries, Hong Kong and 24 countries R

This article is a replication of

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement
Cheng Hsiao, H. Steve Ching, Shui Ki Wan A Panel Data Approach For Program Evaluation: Measuring The Benefits Of Political And Economic Integration Of Hong Kong With Mainland China JAE 2012 5 705–40 - - 3 - reproduction (new methods) - - - -

References

DOI: 10.1002/jae.2557 IDEAS: - EconPapers: -


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox