A replication study worth replicating: A comment on Salmanowitz and Spamann (International Review of Law and Economics 2019)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search



Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
William H. J. Hubbard A replication study worth replicating: A comment on Salmanowitz and Spamann International Review of Law and Economics 2019 58 1-2 - Replication, Empirical legal studies, Chevron

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
- - - - - - - -

This article is a replication of

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement
Natalie Salmanowitz, Holger Spamann Does the Supreme Court Really Not Apply Chevron When It Should? International Review of Law and Economics 2019 57 81-89 K20, K23, K40 Chevron, Deference, Standard of review, Statutory interpretation, Administrative law, Supreme court - - - - -

References

DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2018.12.002 IDEAS: - EconPapers: -


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox