A comment on “Three reasons to use annual payments in contingent valuation” (J Env Econ & Management forthcoming)

From ReplicationWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
When last checked on October 1, 2017, this study was forthcoming in the journal Journal of Environmental Economics & Management.



Contents

Article

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords
John C. Whitehead A comment on “Three reasons to use annual payments in contingent valuation” J Env Econ & Management forthcoming - - Q51 Contingent valuation method, Payment schedule, Willingness to pay

Article information

Program code Data Readme Method(s) & estimation Data type Data used Origin of data used Software used (Version)
- - - - - - - -

This article is a replication of

Authors Title Journal Year Edition Pages JEL Codes Keywords Replication type Replication result [refer to replication type 1 and 2] Raw data Call into question Authors statement
Kevin J. Egan, Jay R. Corrigan, Daryl F. Dwyer Three reasons to use annual payments in contingent valuation surveys: Convergent validity, discount rates, and mental accounting J Env Econ & Management 2015 72 123-36 - Discounting, Contingent valuation, Convergent validity, Willingness to pay, Time frame, Time horizon, Wetlands - 2 - failed (different results) - 1 - yes 1 - rejected results

References

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.004 IDEAS: - EconPapers: -


Reply: "Reply to “A Comment on ‘Three Reasons to Use Annual Payments in Contingent Valuation’”", Egan, Kevin J., Jay R. Corrigan, and Daryl F. Dwyer, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management forthcoming. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.06.003
Further comment: "Who Knows What Willingness to Pay Lurks in the Hearts of Men? A Rejoinder to Egan, Corrigan, and Dwyer", John C. Whitehead, Econ Journal Watch 2017, 14(3) September: 346–361.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox